Home – Blog – Web Experience Management: Content Management Systems? Not An Easy Decision!
January 31, 2012 —
Think of three images bundled up as a carousel. One has the name Drupal in bold characters, the second image reads Joomla, and the third one WebCenter Sites. As the carousel is flickering on your screen, you – the stakeholder – have the choice between these three Content Management Systems. Among other factors, cost, features, integration, and scalability will likely prevail in your final decision. With that, here are the facts for each platform:
|Open source/community of developers||Thousands of modules and APIs that might overlap|
|PHP||Limited usability for non-developers|
|Worldwide support in multiple languages||No backward compatibility for different versions|
|Contributed modules and plugins||Slow performance and poor scalability. Out of the box cached pages delivered to anonymous users only|
|Free Cost||Painful updates|
|Ease of use for content editors||Cannot create multiple sites|
|Caching support||Lacks flexibility for developers|
|Simple installation||Limited functionality for blogs (no comments feature added out of the box)|
|Open source/community of developers||Poor scalability beyond 50,000 visitors per day|
|Extensive number of plugins/components|
|Oracle WebCenter Sites|
|Complete WEM experience (mobile web site, blogs, gadgets, etc…)||UI lacks usability for content contributors|
|Flexibilty in creating, modifying, and associating content||Not Free (Oracle License & Maintenance)|
|Content Publishing is dynamic and static based on the needs of the delivery systems|
|Workflow capabilities constructed based on roles and database permissions|
|Scalable , enterprise system with single sign-on capability|
|Integration with other Oracle tools and systems|
Which brings us to Oracle WebCenter Sites, previously known as Fatwire. This product suite spans an entire set of Web Experience Management tools that prove to be integrated into a core engine named: Content Server. The WebCenter Sites suite of products has proven to highly perform in a scalable environment. Page caching is provided at every level (content contributors and visitors) to fetch content as timely as possible to an exponential number of visitors. Content Server supports multiple sites and the sharing resources between them. Among the advantages of using WebCenter Sites are its well maintained and well organized products improvements. The creation of APIs and new tools to support developers and contributors alike are supervised and distributed by a single engineering team with a clear mission. This is in stark contrast with communities of contributors to open source systems.
Today, Content Server and its related components are owned by Oracle, which most enterprises heavily depend on for database implementations, middleware, etc. In the next few months and years, we should expect Oracle Sites to mature into a fully integrated solution of other Oracle solutions such as ADF. It would decrease implementation times and the creation of an extensive community of developers and experts as more companies will make the move to using WebCenter Sites. The main advantage of Joomla and Drupal are the relatively free cost of the product. However, customizations will require some important coding time and additional product development costs. Consequently WebCenter Sites offers a bundle of products satisfying requirements of major stakeholders: from marketing to analytics. For many retail customers, the cost of Oracle Sites has proven to be offset by a smoothly integrated WEM solution that will support their entire customer base.
You are still looking at your screen but you have made your decision. As soon as your choice pops up, you click on it. Which one was it?