<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WWW Crawlers gotcha down?  De-mystifying the nebulous &#8220;OKAssertError (282610)&#8221; error and the dreaded Property Bag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.function1.com/2009/07/www-crawlers-gotcha-down-de-mystifying-the-nebulous-okasserterror-282610-error-and-the-dreaded-property-bag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.function1.com/2009/07/www-crawlers-gotcha-down-de-mystifying-the-nebulous-okasserterror-282610-error-and-the-dreaded-property-bag/</link>
	<description>Discussing all things portal, WebCenter Interaction, WebCenter Suite, Sharepoint, and related technologies.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 00:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: omidk.myopenid.com</title>
		<link>http://www.function1.com/2009/07/www-crawlers-gotcha-down-de-mystifying-the-nebulous-okasserterror-282610-error-and-the-dreaded-property-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>omidk.myopenid.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.function1.com/index.php/266/uncategorized/www-crawlers-gotcha-down-de-mystifying-the-nebulous-okasserterror-282610-error-and-the-dreaded-property-bag#comment-65</guid>
		<description>My understanding was that property bags exist as an alternative to serializing an object.  Because the WCI supports .NET and Java they went with XML to work with whatever library they use that is used across both platforms.
I agree with you though that I think if it was designed today, few people would design a database like that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding was that property bags exist as an alternative to serializing an object.  Because the WCI supports .NET and Java they went with XML to work with whatever library they use that is used across both platforms.<br />
I agree with you though that I think if it was designed today, few people would design a database like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
